欢迎来到英语好学网

GMAT 考试|GMAT考试写作例文224篇连载(一零九)

来源:www.tspmpb.com 2024-07-19
109. All personnel evaluations2 at a company should be multi-directional that is, people at every level of the organization should review not only those working under them but also those working over them.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
The speaker asserts that employees at all levels in an organization should review one another, including those working over them as well as under them. I agree in part. Often companies will conduct two different kinds of periodic review, one to justify3 decisions regarding promotion4 and pay, and another to increase overall efficiency by assessing employee performance. Multi-directional evaluation1 should never be part of the first kind of review; however, it can be valuable in the second kind and, therefore, should be used there.
On the one hand, lower-level employees have too much organizational power if their evaluations are used in decisions about the pay or promotions5 of their superiors. Employees can intimidate6 superiors with the threat of bad review. Also employees can use the review process to retaliate7 against those at higher levels. In either case, the authority of a manager or an executive can be seriously compromised, and productivity is lost in the process.
On the other hand, the most revealing criticisms of a superiors style often come from those subject to it. In a process of review that isnt connected to promotion or pay, employees at all levels can be more comfortable and forthright8 about sharing concerns. In turn, every employee is more likely to get accurate feedback, including constructive9 criticism, that will help each nurture10 strengths and improve areas of weakness. In this way , multi-directional evaluation can greatly enhance organizational efficiency.
Furthermore, multi-directional evaluation in this context helps prevent worker alienation11 and subsequent lowered productivity. Widening the performance review process will very likely foster a greater sense of personal involvement in ones work, especially among lower-level employees. Recent studies have shown that people who feel more invested in their jobs tend to work more cooperatively and productively.
In conclusion, there is an important role for multi-directional personnel evaluation in the workplace. While it should be clearly separate from issues of promotion and pay, as part of the performance review process it can encourage better employee relations and higher productivity.


相关文章推荐

07

19

GMAT 考试|GMAT考试写作例文224篇连载(一零六)

106. The following appeared in a memo1 to the Saluda town council from the towns business manager.Research indicates tha

07

19

GMAT 考试|每天一读之词语篇4

hortative1 : encourage :: exculpatory2 : absolve3 absolve inculpate4 abstain vi. 自制,戒绝,弃权,防止 to refrain deliberately5 an

07

19

GMAT 考试|每天一读之词语篇6

abhorrence1 : dislike :: adoration2 : fondness adulate3 : fawn4 :: woo : adore apprehension5 : terror :: affection : ado

07

18

GMAT 考试|十月11-20日awa机井总结

人工智能 1.是失业问题应该是个人的责任还是政府的责任那篇, 2.应该把私人事情和工作分开。 3.是那道跨国企业的打造使全球趋于同化,如此,企业就能生产同样的商品来满足所有人的需要。

07

18

GMAT 考试|托福考试第一部分写作部分指南及需要

托福考试的第一部分是写作TWE (Test of Written English),主要考察考生学术性写作的能力。它需要考生在30分钟的时间内完成一篇250-350字的短文,依据文章的结构、语法、词语等衡量作者是不是可以适应美国大学、研究生

06

08

GMAT 考试|GMAT考试写作方法指导:Issue写作范

24. Historical examples of both influential1 public officials and influential business leaders abound2. However, the pow

06

08

GMAT 考试|GMAT考试:Argument写作范本四十三

83. The conclusion of this argument is that 15-year-olds should be eligible1 to obtain a driver's license2. The author e

06

08

GMAT 考试|GMAT考试:Argument写作范本十七

33. The author of Perks1 Company's business plan recommends that funds currently spent on the employee benefits package

06

08

GMAT 考试|2006年写作考试辅导之GMAT作文黄金80

57、看来有明显和确实的征兆说明所有地方的大家都变得对彼此的不同愈加尊重。 60、没雇员的赞同时,雇主应该没权力去知道他的雇员的健康情况和其他的私生活活方面的信息。

06

08

GMAT 考试|GMAT考试写作例文224篇连载(一)

1. The following appeared as part of an annual report sent to stockholders by Olympic Foods, a processor of frozen foods